h-index: 18     i10-index: 25

Resilience Framework for Critical Infrastructure: Artificial Intelligence Applications in Post-Disaster Ground Damage Assessment

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville (SIUE), Edwardsville, IL, USA

2 Department of Data Science, Maryville University, St. Louis, MO, USA

10.48309/jeires.2026.569173.1337
Abstract
The increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters in the United States pose major challenges to national security, economic stability, and the resilience of critical infrastructure systems. A substantial share of disaster-related infrastructure damage results from geotechnical failures such as landslides, soil liquefaction, and erosion. Effective post-disaster recovery, therefore, depends on rapid and accurate ground damage assessment; yet conventional field-based inspection methods remain time-intensive, costly, and limited in spatial coverage. This review examines recent advances in artificial intelligence and deep learning techniques for post-disaster geotechnical damage assessment. It synthesizes state-of-the-art approaches, particularly convolutional neural networks, for automated detection and classification of ground damage using high-resolution satellite imagery, unmanned aerial vehicle data, and interferometric synthetic aperture radar. The reviewed studies indicate that AI-assisted frameworks enable near-real-time damage mapping at regional and national scales. From an operational perspective, AI-based damage assessment supports faster prioritization of inspections, improved resource allocation, and reduced recovery times for federal and state agencies, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency and State Departments of Transportation. The review also identifies key challenges related to data standardization, model generalization, and scalability, and outlines future directions to support nationwide implementation and long-term infrastructure resilience. Unlike existing reviews, this study provides a nationally focused synthesis that explicitly links AI-driven geotechnical damage detection methodologies with post-disaster decision-making, emergency response prioritization, and long-term critical infrastructure resilience at regional and national scales.

Graphical Abstract

Resilience Framework for Critical Infrastructure: Artificial Intelligence Applications in Post-Disaster Ground Damage Assessment

Keywords

Subjects


OPEN ACCESS

©2026 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

[1] Montgomery, H. Final call: Climate change and us. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 2024, 54(1), 101-104.
[2] Smith, A. An active year of us billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. Climate. gov. Retrieved February, 2024, 16, 2025.
[3] Solorzano, J., Morante-Carballo, F., Montalvan-Burbano, N., Briones-Bitar, J., Carrion-Mero, P. A systematic review of the relationship between geotechnics and disasters. Sustainability, 2022, 14(19), 12835.
[4] Cheng, Y., Gan, Y., Shi, C., Huo, A., Pei, Y., Song, Y., Wang, X., Ahmed, A. A critical analysis of geological hazard risk assessment including future perspectives. Sustainability, 2024, 16(9), 3701.
[5] Moormann, C., Effenberger, M. Risk analysis and mitigation in geotechnical engineering–lessons learned from the collapse of the historical archive in cologne due to underground construction. Geotechnical Engineering Challenges to Meet Current and Emerging Needs of Society, 2024, 45-71.
[6] Harle, S.M., Wankhade, R.L. Machine learning techniques for predictive modelling in geotechnical engineering: A succinct review. Discover Civil Engineering, 2025, 2(1), 1-21.
[8] de Araujo, T.M.A., de Mattos Teixeira, C.A., Francês, C.R.L. Enhancing geotechnical damage detection with deep learning: A convolutional neural network approach. PeerJ Computer Science, 2024, 10, e2052.
[9] Magidanga, V., Kutela, B., Novat, N., Das, S. Understanding the lifecycle of federal-level artificial intelligence (ai) tools. A case of department of homeland security. A Case of Department of Homeland Security (January 23, 2025), 2025.
[10] Lin, S., Liang, Z., Guo, H., Hu, Q., Cao, X., Zheng, H. Application of machine learning in early warning system of geotechnical disaster: A systematic and comprehensive review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2025, 58(6), 168.
[11] Bozorgzadeh, N., Feng, Y. Evaluation structures for machine learning models in geotechnical engineering. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 2024, 18(1), 52-59.
[12] Munawar, H.S., Ullah, F., Qayyum, S., Khan, S.I., Mojtahedi, M. Uavs in disaster management: Application of integrated aerial imagery and convolutional neural network for flood detection. Sustainability, 2021, 13(14), 7547.
[13] Kane, B. R., Webber, S., Tucker, K. H., Wallace, S., Chang, J., McCarthy, D., Murphy, D., Egel, D.,Wingfield, T. Threats to Critical Infrastructure: A Survey. RAND Corporation, 2024.
[14] Heibaum, M. Natural disasters mitigation by using construction methods with geosynthetics (flooding). Proceedings 10th International Conference on Geosynthetics, 2014, 10.
[15] Meslem, A., Iversen, H., Iranpour, K., Lang, D. A computational platform to assess liquefaction-induced loss at critical infrastructures scale. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 19(10), 4083-4114.
[16] Pratap, B., Dev, H., Singh, R. Use of appropriate geophysical technique for subsurface assessment. Journal of Rock Mechanics & Tunnelling Technology (JRMTT), 2015, 21(2), 89-99.
[17] Chultemgombo, B., Tsedenbat, A. Geotechnical study on Salkhit silver-gold open-pit mine. Proceedings of the Resource Operator Conference (ROC2025), University of Wollongong, 2025.
[18] Christian, J.T. Geotechnical engineering reliability: How well do we know what we are doing? Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004, 130(10), 985-1003.
[19] Meivel, S., Devi, K.I., Subramanian, A.S., Kalaiarasi, G. Remote sensing analysis of the lidar drone mapping system for detecting damages to buildings, roads, and bridges using the faster cnn method. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2025, 53(2), 327-343.
[20] Ali, A., Aziz, M., Rasool, A.M., Ali, U., Umar, M., Wani, K.S. Applications of remote sensing technologies to assess ground displacements and seismic hazards: Precision, scale, and insight. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2025, 50(20), 16357-16378.
[22] Firoozi, A.A., Firoozi, A.A. Smart geotechnics: Enhancing infrastructure resilience with IoT and AI. JCEU, 2024, 14(1), 89-101.
[23] Jong, S., Ong, D., Oh, E. State-of-the-art review of geotechnical-driven artificial intelligence techniques in underground soil-structure interaction. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 113, 103946.
[24] Memiş, M.A., Keskin, I., Demir, S., Memiş, Ş.U. Machine learning-based prediction of permafrost degradation and its implications on geotechnical infrastructure: A comprehensive review. AI in Civil Engineering, 2025, 4(1), 28.
[25] Breiman, L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1), 5-32.
[26] Bishop, C.M., Nasrabadi, N.M. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Book, 2006, 4(4).
[27] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature, 2015, 521(7553), 436-444.
[28] Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, 2015, 234-241.
[29] He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollár, P., Girshick, R. Mask R-CNN. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2017, 2961-2969.
[30] Ghorbanzadeh, O., Meena, S.R., Blaschke, T., Aryal, J. Uav-based slope failure detection using deep-learning convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(17), 2046.
[31] Ghorbanzadeh, O., Blaschke, T., Gholamnia, K., Meena, S.R., Tiede, D., Aryal, J. Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(2), 196.
[32] Bai, Y., Gao, C., Singh, S., Koch, M., Adriano, B., Mas, E., Koshimura, S. A framework of rapid regional tsunami damage recognition from post-event terrasar-x imagery using deep neural networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2017, 15(1), 43-47.
[33] Joshi, G., Natsuaki, R., Hirose, A. Multi-sensor satellite-imaging data fusion for earthquake damage assessment and the significant features. 2021 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar (APSAR), 2021, 1-6.
[35] Ghorbanzadeh, O., Shahabi, H., Crivellari, A., Homayouni, S., Blaschke, T., Ghamisi, P. Landslide detection using deep learning and object-based image analysis. Landslides, 2022, 19(4), 929-939.
[36] Liu, C.-Y., Ku, C.Y., Chiu, Y.J., Wu, T.Y. Evaluation of liquefaction potential in central taiwan using random forest method. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1), 27517.
[37] Guo, Y., Hu, S., Wu, W., Wang, Y., Senthilnath, J. Multitemporal time series analysis using machine learning models for ground deformation in the erhai region, china. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2020, 192(7), 464.
[38] Xing, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, G.-Z. Improved yolov5-based uav pavement crack detection. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2023, 23(14), 15901-15909.
[39] Wengang, Z., Hanlong, L., Lin, W., Xing, Z., Yanmei, Z. Application of machine learning in slope stability assessment. Book, 2023.
[40] Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 1997, 9(8), 1735-1780.
[41] Anand, A., Sabri, M.S., Jaiswal, A., Verma, A.K. Development of early warning system for slope instability. International Conference on Geotechnical Issues in Energy, Infrastructure and Disaster Management, 2024, 271-282.
[42] Olszewski, T., Olszewski, T., Liu, I., Cunningham, A. Survey of federal community resilience programs and available resilience planning tools. Book, 2021.
[43] Herrera, E.K., Flannery, A., Krimmer, M. Risk and resilience analysis for highway assets. Transportation Research Record, 2017, 2604(1), 1-8.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 10 February 2026

  • Receive Date 28 December 2025
  • Revise Date 29 January 2026
  • Accept Date 10 February 2026