h-index: 18     i10-index: 25

Engineered Nanoparticles in Soil Ecosystems: Impacts ‎on Micro and Macro-Organisms, Benefits, and Risks

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, TMU, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
The application of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in agriculture has garnered significant attention due to their potential to enhance soil health, nutrient availability, and plant growth. ENPs interact with soil ecosystems by modulating microbial diversity, influencing macro-organisms, and altering root physiology. While certain nanoparticles improve nutrient uptake and stimulate beneficial microbial activity, others exhibit toxicity that may disrupt soil biodiversity and ecological balance. The effects of ENPs on plant roots range from improved permeability and nutrient absorption to oxidative stress and cellular damage. Their interactions with soil microbiota and macro-organisms highlight the complexity of their ecological impact, necessitating a careful evaluation of their long-term sustainability. This review synthesizes current findings on ENP-soil interactions, emphasizing their dual role as both enhancers and potential stressors within agricultural environments. Future research should focus on mitigating risks associated with nanoparticle accumulation in soil while optimizing their benefits for sustainable agricultural practices.

Graphical Abstract

Engineered Nanoparticles in Soil Ecosystems: Impacts ‎on Micro and Macro-Organisms, Benefits, and Risks

Keywords


 

Introduction

The integration of nanoparticles (NPs) into agricultural practices has been increasingly explored due to their potential to enhance plant growth and soil health. Engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) can modulate soil properties such as pH, nutrient availability, and organic matter decomposition rates, influencing both micro- and macro-organisms within the soil ecosystem [1,2]. Recent studies have highlighted the complex effects of engineered NPs on soil microbial communities and nutrient cycling, with responses ranging from stimulation to inhibition depending on concentration and type. For instance, certain NPs like zinc oxide (ZnO) have shown antimicrobial activity, affecting soil microbiota and potentially altering key microbial functions [3]. The rhizosphere is the soil region surrounding plant roots, where complex interactions between roots and microorganisms occur. The presence of nanoparticles can alter the composition and dynamics of microbial populations in this zone, potentially influencing nutrient availability, soil health, and plant development (Figure 1) [4].

The impact of NPs on soil ecosystems is multifaceted. They can improve soil structure by enhancing water retention and aggregate stability, which in turn affects microbial activity and nutrient availability. However, there are concerns regarding the environmental risks associated with NPs accumulation in soils, including potential toxicity to beneficial microorganisms and alterations in soil structure [4, 5].

Understanding the interactions between NPs and soil ecosystems is crucial for harnessing their benefits while mitigating risks. This involves examining how ENPs influence microbial diversity, nutrient cycling, and plant growth, as well as assessing their long-term effects on ecosystem health. The ENPs application in agriculture offers several advantages, including improved nutrient delivery and enhanced stress tolerance in plants. However, the environmental implications of their widespread use necessitate careful evaluation to ensure sustainable agricultural practices. In this context, the role of NPs in modulating soil microorganisms is particularly significant. By altering soil properties and microbial communities, NPs can either promote or inhibit plant growth depending on their concentration and type [6,7].

Moreover, the effects of NPs on macro-organisms, such as insects and other soil fauna, are also critical. These organisms play crucial roles in soil ecosystems, contributing to nutrient cycling and soil structure maintenance. The balance between the benefits and risks of NPs in soil ecosystems is delicate. While they offer potential solutions for improving agricultural productivity, their environmental impact must be carefully managed to prevent unintended consequences [8,9].

This study aims to explore the complex interactions between ENPs and soil ecosystems, focusing on both micro- and macro-organisms. By examining the advantages and risks associated with NPs use, we can better understand how to harness their benefits while ensuring sustainable and environmentally conscious agricultural practices. The exploration of these interactions is crucial for developing strategies that maximize the potential of NPs in enhancing soil health and plant productivity. Understanding the impact of NPs on microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, is essential for optimizing nutrient cycling and plant growth. Similarly, assessing their effects on macro-organisms like earthworms and insects helps in maintaining ecosystem balance and biodiversity. The advantages of using NPs include improved nutrient delivery, enhanced plant resistance to diseases, and reduced chemical usage. However, potential risks such as bioaccumulation and toxicity in the food chain must be carefully evaluated. By balancing these factors, we can ensure that NPs applications contribute to sustainable agriculture without compromising environmental integrity.

NPs effect on soil microbiota

Bacteria

Studies have shown that silver NPs (AgNPs) can significantly alter the composition of soil microbial communities. Specifically, AgNPs have been found to decrease the abundance of certain bacterial groups. For instance, exposure to AgNPs has been reported to reduce the populations of beta-Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. These changes in microbial community structure can have profound effects on soil health and nutrient cycling, ultimately impacting plant growth and productivity [13].

NPs have the potential to impact on the population of rhizosphere bacteria, affecting both deleterious and beneficial microorganisms. By increasing the richness of rhizosphere microbiota, NPs can indirectly enhance plant nutrient absorption and ultimately promote plant growth [14].

For instance, the application of nano-selenium to pepper plants significantly increased the presence of beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere soil. This encompassed various bacterial groups including Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Gemmatimonadetes, Deltaproteobacteria, and Anaerolineae [15,16].                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

                                                   

Figure 1: The rhizosphere and associated organisms. The rhizosphere, the soil region surrounding plant roots, hosts a diverse array of macro- and micro-organisms whose interactions play a crucial role in soil health and plant development. NPs may affect these communities, potentially modifying their ecological functions and influencing plant-microbe interactions [10-12].

Nano-selenium influences the rhizosphere microbiome by increasing bacterial diversity and complexity. This shift in microbial community composition is associated with enhanced disease resistance and improved nutrient availability for potatoes. Beneficial microorganisms like Bacillus and Pseudomonas are promoted, which can aid in nutrient cycling and plant growth. The enhancement of beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms by NPs like nano-selenium highlights their potential role in sustainable agriculture. These beneficial microorganisms can improve soil health by facilitating nutrient cycling, promoting root growth, and increasing plant resilience to environmental stresses [17].

By modulating the microbial community structure in the rhizosphere, NPs can create a more favorable environment for plant growth. The application of nano-selenium fertilizer, particularly when applied twice during the seedling stage, significantly decreased the disease index of potato scab caused by Streptomyces spp. This reduction in disease severity is attributed to the enhanced resistance mechanisms in potatoes [18].

Understanding the interactions between NPs and rhizosphere microorganisms is crucial for optimizing their application in agriculture. Research has shown that NPs can stimulate the growth of specific microbial groups that are essential for nutrient assimilation and plant health. For example, Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria are known for their roles in nitrogen fixation and phosphorus solubilization, which are vital processes for plant nutrition. The use of silica dioxide NPs (SiO2 NPs) has been found to enhance the production, transport, and release of organic acids in rice roots. These organic acids provide a rich source of carbon for microorganisms in the rhizosphere, resulting in a substantial increase of 15.2-80.5% in beneficial microbes like Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. This improvement optimizes the bacterial community structure and supports enhanced nitrogen absorption and plant growth, as reported by some studies [19].

The impact of AgNPs and other NPs on soil bacterial communities underscores their potential to reshape microbial dynamics. While beneficial bacteria such as Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria can enhance nutrient cycling, the reduction of specific bacterial groups due to nanoparticle expo

OPEN ACCESS

©2025 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

[1]. J.F. Qarachal, E. Sheidaee, P. Bazyar, The impact of various nanomaterials and nano-agrochemicals on agricultural systems, Journal of Engineering in Industrial Research, 2023, 4, 226-243. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[2]. M. Alizadeh, J.F. Qarachal, E. Sheidaee, Understanding the ecological impacts of nanoparticles: risks, monitoring, and mitigation strategies, Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering, 2025, 10, 6. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[3]. E.I. Strekalovskaya, A.I. Perfileva, K.V. Krutovsky, Zinc oxide nanoparticles in the “Soil–Bacterial Community–Plant” system: Impact on the stability of soil ecosystems, Agronomy, 2024, 14, 1588. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[4]. V.D. Rajput, T. Minkina, S. Sushkova, V. Tsitsuashvili, S. Mandzhieva, A. Gorovtsov, ... & N. Gromakova, Effect of nanoparticles on crops and soil microbial communities, Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018, 18, 2179-2187. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[5]. R. Dinesh, M. Anandaraj, V. Srinivasan, S. Hamza, Engineered nanoparticles in the soil and their potential implications to microbial activity, Geoderma, 2012, 173, 19-27. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[6]. S. Gupta, D. Kumar, A. Aziz, M. AE AbdelRahman, A.R.A. Mustafa, A. Scopa, A.R. Moursy, Nanoecology: Exploring engineered nanoparticles’ impact on soil ecosystem health and biodiversity, Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 2024, 64, 1637-1655. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[7]. A. Rehman, S. ur Rahman, P. Li, I.H. Shah, M.A. Manzoor, M. Azam, J. Cao, M.S. Malik, M. Jeridi, N. Ahmad, K.F. Alabbosh, Modulating plant-soil microcosm with green synthesized ZnONPs in arsenic contaminated soil, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 470, 134130. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[8]. Y. Jia, D. Gu, X. Du, W, Yang, X. Yin, Q. Li, X. Kong, Y. Gao, Q. Kong, T. Liu, ZnO Nanoparticles and soil fauna affect nutrient transfer via effects on soil fungal community during returned wheat straw decomposition, International Journal of Environmental Research, 2024, 18, 63. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[9]. S. Pittarate, V. Perumal, S. Kannan, S. Mekchay, M. Thungrabeab, P. Suttiprapan, S.N. Sengottayan, P. Krutmuang, Krutmuang, Insecticidal efficacy of nanoparticles against Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) larvae and their impact in the soil, Heliyon, 2023, 9. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[10]. Y. Kuzyakov, B.S. Razavi, Rhizosphere size and shape: Temporal dynamics and spatial stationarity, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 135, 343-360. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[11]. A. Piotrowska-Długosz, J. Długosz, M. Frąc, A. Gryta, B. Breza-Boruta, Enzymatic activity and functional diversity of soil microorganisms along the soil profile, A matter of soil depth and soil forming processes, Geoderma, 416,115779. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[12]. D. Naylor, K. Naasko, M. Smith, S. Couvillion, C. Nicora, J. Trejo, S. Fransen, R. Danczak, R. McClure, K.S. Hofmockel, J.K. Jansson, Interactive effects of depth and differential irrigation on soil microbiome composition and functioning, Frontiers in Microbiomes, 2023, 2, 1078024. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[13]. A.L. Grün, C. Emmerling, Long-term effects of environmentally relevant concentrations of silver nanoparticles on major soil bacterial phyla of a loamy soil, Environmental Sciences Europe, 2018, 30, 1-13. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[14]. J. Xu, X. Luo, Y. Wang, Y. Feng, Evaluation of zinc oxide nanoparticles on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) growth and soil bacterial community, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25, 6026-6035. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[15]. D. Li, C. Zhou, Y. Wu, Q. An, J. Zhang, Y. Fang, J.Q. Li, C. Pan, Nanoselenium integrates soil-pepper plant homeostasis by recruiting rhizosphere-beneficial microbiomes and allocating signaling molecule levels under Cd stress, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 432, 128763. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[16]. H. Zhang, T. Zheng, Y. Wang, T. Li, Q. Chi, Multifaceted impacts of nanoparticles on plant nutrient absorption and soil microbial communities, Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15, 1497006. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[17]. C. Wang, L. Yue, B. Cheng, F. Chen, X. Zhao, Z. Wang, B. Xing, Mechanisms of growth-promotion and Se-enrichment in Brassica chinensis L. by selenium nanomaterials: beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms, nutrient availability, and photosynthesis, Environmental Science: Nano, 2022, 9, 302-312. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[18]. H. Liu, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. Shi, Nano-selenium strengthens potato resistance to potato scab induced by Streptomyces spp., increases yield, and elevates tuber quality by influencing rhizosphere microbiomes, Frontiers in Plant Science, 2025, 16, 1523174. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[19]. L. Yue, J. Wang, X. Cao, C. Wang, C. Ma, F. Chen, B. Cheng, Y. Feng, Z. Wang, B. Xing, Silica nanomaterials promote rice tillering and yield by regulating rhizosphere processes, nitrogen uptake, and hormone pathways, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2023, 11, 16650-16660. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[20]. A.A. Malandrakis, N. Kavroulakis, C.V. Chrysikopoulos, Use of copper, silver and zinc nanoparticles against foliar and soil-borne plant pathogens, Science of the total environment, 2019, 670, 292-299. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[21]. A. Kalia, J. Kaur, A. Kaur, N. Singh, Antimycotic activity of biogenically synthesised metal and metal oxide nanoparticles against plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium moniliforme (F. fujikuroi), Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 2020, 58, 263-270. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
[22]. J. Ali, D. Alam, R. Noori, S. Faridi, M. Sardar, Metal nanoparticles: Management and control of phytopathogenic fungi. Advances in Antifungal Drug Development: Natural Products with Antifungal Potential, 2024, 411-437. [Crossref], [Google Scholar] , [Publisher]
[23]. S. Sharma, P. Kumari, P. Thakur, G.S. Brar, N.A. Bouqellah, A.E.L. Hesham, Synthesis and characterization of Ni0. 5Al0. 5Fe2O4 nanoparticles for potent antifungal activity against dry rot of ginger (Fusarium oxysporum), Scientific Reports, 2022, 12, 20092. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[24]. Y. Feng, X. Cui, S. He, G. Dong, M. Chen, J. Wang, X. Lin, The role of metal nanoparticles in influencing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi effects on plant growth, Environmental science & technology, 2013, 47, 9496-9504. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[25]. L. Chen, Y. Xiao, Silver nanoparticles and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence Trifolium repen root-associated AMF community structure and its co-occurrence pattern, Scientia Horticulturae, 2023, 320, 112232. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[26]. J. Cao, Y. Feng, X. Lin, J. Wang, Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate the negative effects of iron oxide nanoparticles on bacterial community in rhizospheric soils, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2016, 4, 10. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[27]. J. Luo, Q. Yan, G. Yang, Y. Wang, Impact of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Funneliformis mosseae on the physiological and defence responses of Canna indica to copper oxide nanoparticles stress, Journal of Fungi, 2022, 8, 513. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[28]. S.V. Zinovieva, Z.V. Udalova, O.S. Khasanovа, Nanomaterials in plant protection against parasitic nemates, Uspehi Sovremennoj Biologii, 2023, 143, 278-299. [Crossref], [Google Scholar] , [Publisher]
[29]. E.Q. Contreras, H.L. Puppala, G. Escalera, W. Zhong, V.L. Colvin, Size‐dependent impacts of silver nanoparticles on the lifespan, fertility, growth, and locomotion of Caenorhabditis elegans. Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2014, 33, 2716-2723. [Crossref], [Google Scholar] , [Publisher]
[30]. K.F. Abdellatif, R.H. Abdelfattah, M.S.M. El-Ansary, Green nanoparticles engineering on root-knot nematode infecting eggplants and their effect on plant DNA modification, Iranian Journal of Biotechnology, 2016, 14, 250. [Crossref], [Google Scholar] , [Publisher]
[31]. M.A. El-Qurashi, F.A. Al-Yahya, A.S. Al-Hazmi, A.A. Saleh, Efficacy of biologically synthesized nanoparticles on suppression plant-parasitic nematodes: A review, Egyptian Journal of Agronematology, 2023, 22, 41-60. [Crossref], [Google Scholar] , [Publisher]
[32]. A.K.H. Sabry, Role of nanotechnology applications in plant-parasitic nematode control. Nanobiotechnology Applications in Plant Protection, 2019, 2, 223-240. [Crossref], [Google Scholar] , [Publisher]
[33]. A. Manke, L. Wang, Y. Rojanasakul, Mechanisms of nanoparticle‐induced oxidative stress and toxicity, BioMed Research International, 2013, 1, 942916. [Crossref], [Google Scholar] , [Publisher]
[34]. R.P. Mendoza, J.M. Brown, Engineered nanomaterials and oxidative stress: Current understanding and future challenges. Current Opinion in Toxicology, 2019, 13, 74-80. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[35]. D. Beisser, F. Kaschani, N. Graupner, L. Grossmann, M. Jensen, S. Ninck, F. Schulz, S. Rahmann, J. Boenigk, M. Kaiser, Quantitative proteomics reveals ecophysiological effects of light and silver stress on the mixotrophic protist poterioochromonas malhamensis, PLoS One, 2017, 12, e0168183. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[36]. S.J. Cameron, J. Sheng, F. Hosseinian, W.G. Willmore, Nanoparticle effects on stress response pathways and nanoparticle–protein interactions, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23, 7962. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[37]. B. Komazec, P. Cvjetko, B. Balen, I. Letofsky-Papst, D.M. Lyons, P. Peharec Štefanić, The occurrence of oxidative stress Induced by Silver nanoparticles in Chlorella vulgaris depends on the surface-stabilizing Agent. Nanomaterials, 2023, 13, 1967. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[38]. H. Zhu, S. Fu, H. Zou, Y. Su, Y. Zhang, Effects of nanoplastics on microalgae and their trophic transfer along the food chain: Recent advances and perspectives. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 2021, 23, 1873-1883. [Crossref], [Google Scholar] , [Publisher]
[39]. R.W. Lewis, P.M. Bertsch, D.H. McNear, Nanotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) to environmentally relevant beneficial soil bacteria–a critical review, Nanotoxicology, 2019, 13, 392-428. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[40]. Q. Yu, Toxicity, bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of engineered nanoparticles in the aquatic environment, 2023. [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[41]. J.P. Bourdineaud, A. Štambuk, M. Šrut, S. Radić Brkanac, D. Ivanković, D. Lisjak, D., ..., G.I. Klobučar, Gold and silver nanoparticles effects to the earthworm Eisenia fetida–the importance of tissue over soil concentrations, Drug and Chemical Toxicology, 2021, 44, 12-29. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[42]. S. Zhang, S. Ren, L. Pei, Y. Sun, F. Wang, Ecotoxicological effects of polyethylene microplastics and ZnO nanoparticles on earthworm Eisenia fetida, Applied Soil Ecology, 2022, 176, 104469. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[43]. S. Guo, Q. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Chen, H. Li, J. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Liu, B. Cao, G. Zou, B. Zhang, Ecological risk of microplastic toxicity to earthworms in soil: A bibliometric analysis, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2023, 11, 1126847. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[44]. I.M. Lourenço, A.B. Seabra, M.L. Vera, N. Hoffmann, O.R. Araneda, L.B. Parra, Synthesis and application of zinc oxide nanoparticles in Pieris brassicae larvae as a possible pesticide effect, AIMS Molecular Science, 2024, 11. [Crossref], [Google Scholar] , [Publisher]
[45]. D. Martínez-Cisterna, O. Rubilar, G. Tortella, L. Chen, M. Chacón-Fuentes, M. Lizama, L. Bardehle, Silver nanoparticles as a potent nanopesticide: Toxic effects and action mechanisms on pest insects of agricultural importance—a review, Molecules, 2024, 29, 5520. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[46]. A.H. ALHusani, Evaluation of the efficacy of several plant-based insecticides and aqueous nano-silica formulations against the rust-red flour tribolium castaneum (herbst.) under laboratory conditions, Sciences, 2024, 2, 1042-1048. [Crossref], [Google Scholar],
[47]. A.F. Thabet, H.A. Boraei, O.A. Galal, M.F. El-Samahy, K.M. Mousa, Y.Z. Zhang, M. Tuda, E.A. Helmy, J. Wen, T. Nozaki, Silica nanoparticles as pesticide against insects of different feeding types and their non-target attraction of predators, Scientific Reports, 2021, 11, 14484. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[48]. O. Mosqueda-Frómeta, I. Andujar, G.M. Mosqueda-Rodríguez, A. Pestryakov, B. Companioni, M.D.L. Tapia y Figueroa, J.C. Lorenzo, Mini-review: Application of nanoparticles in plant biotechnology and agriculture, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 2025, 1-5. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[49]. J. Cao, Y. Feng, S. He, X. Lin, Silver nanoparticles deteriorate the mutual interaction between maize (Zea mays L.) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A soil microcosm study. Applied Soil Ecology, 2017, 119, 307-316. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[50]. S. Sharma, V.K. Singh, A. Kumar, S. Mallubhotla, Effect of nanoparticles on oxidative damage and antioxidant defense system in plants. Molecular Plant Abiotic Stress: Biology and Biotechnology, 2019, 315-333. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[51]. D. Singh, A. Kumar, Understanding the effect of the interaction of nanoparticles with roots on the uptake in plants, Environmental Nanotechnology, 2020, 3, 277-304. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[52]. A. Chahardoli, N. Karimi, X. Ma, F. Qalekhani, Effects of engineered aluminum and nickel oxide nanoparticles on the growth and antioxidant defense systems of Nigella arvensis L, Scientific Reports, 2020, 10, 3847. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[53]. G. Li, Q. Gao, A. Nyande, Z. Dong, E.H. Khan, Y. Han, H. Wu, Cerium oxide nanoparticles promoted lateral root formation in Arabidopsis by modulating reactive oxygen species and Ca2+ level, Functional Plant Biology, 2024, 51. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[54]. A. Avellan, J. Yun, B.P. Morais, E.T. Clement, S.M. Rodrigues, G.V. Lowry, Critical review: Role of inorganic nanoparticle properties on their foliar uptake and in planta translocation, Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55, 13417-13431. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[55] S. Rani, N. Kumari, V. Sharma, Uptake, translocation, transformation and physiological effects of nanoparticles in plants, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2023, 69, 1579-1599. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[56]. R.W. Lai, K.W. Yeung, M.M. Yung, A.B. Djurišić, J.P. Giesy, K.M. Leung, Regulation of engineered nanomaterials: current challenges, insights and future directions, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25, 3060-3077. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[57]. M.D. Montano, G.V. Lowry, F. von der Kammer, J. Blue, J.F. Ranville, Current status and future direction for examining engineered nanoparticles in natural systems, Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 11, 351-366. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[58]. M. Hafez, H.F. Khalil, Nanoparticles in sustainable agriculture: Recent advances, challenges, and future prospects, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2024, 55, 2181-2196. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[59]. H.K. Pathak, P.K. Chauhan, C.S. Seth, G. Dubey, G., S.K. Upadhyay, Mechanistic and future prospects in rhizospheric engineering for agricultural contaminants removal, soil health restoration, and management of climate change stress, Science of The Total Environment, 2024, 172116. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[60]. M. Vemula, A.V. Reddy, Polymeric nanoparticles as effective delivery systems in agriculture sustainability, Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering, 2023, 8, 805-814. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
[61]. M. El-Sayed, H.A. Ayoub, M. Helal, W. Sang, Z. Shen, I.A. Abdelhafeez, Nanotechnology-enabled soil management for sustainable agriculture: interactions, challenges, and prospective. Environmental Science: Nano. 2025. [Crossref], [Google Scholar] ], [Publisher]
[62]. A.N. Islam, A. Ridwan, A.K. Neon, M.F. Rab, M.N. Uddin, Engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in aquatic environments and soil-plant ecosystems: Transformation, Toxicity, and Environ-Mental Challenge, 2025. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
Volume 6, Issue 3
Spring 2025
Pages 261-274

  • Receive Date 11 June 2025