Machine Modification and Material Replacement to Reduce Production Cost Using PDCA Method with Fishbone Diagram and Why Why Analysis
Pages 136-141
https://doi.org/10.48309/jeires.2024.211563
Andriyas Sugiarto, Alvi Octavianto Octavianto, Syafrian Eko Nugroho Nugroho, Yudi Prastyo
Abstract In the fierce competition in the Industrial world, meeting customer needs to maintain loyalty and trust is a major concern. In this case, the order received at Job 23xxx was in the form of UNP bending which is a new model and has never been produced. The existing machine does not meet the needs of completing this job; therefore, the initial plan was chosen to use the welded plate. The welded plate is a waste of time and material. Thus, there must be a machine modification for UNP bending. Machine modification is done by adding a stopper (JIG) so that the roll plate machine can turn into a UNP roll machine. Quality and speed of completion time are the main goals so that customers continue to entrust work to our company. PDCA method with fishbone diagram and why analysis is applied in solving this problem. The present study was conducted by comparing the number of process sequences, process time, and material requirements. Welded plate requires 5 process sequences while UNP material only requires 3 process sequences. Completion of work using welded plate requires 4.874 hours while UNP material only requires 0.807 hours for 1 set of products. This means that the process with UNP material only takes 16.65% of the welded plate process. This makes work completion faster. The cost of welded plate material is Rp. 1,335,956 while UNP material is Rp. 950,756, meaning the cost of UNP material is 71% compared to welded plate material. Saving material costs Rp. 385,200 or 29% per 1 set.

